Stock option backdating illegal
In the last year, numerous cases of backdating stock options have come to light.
Apple has been the most high profile company to be embroiled in the scandal.
We have proven that over time, executives are actually better off using this process.
Trying to time the market is a risky endeavor and manipulating it is even worse.
Chandler III, made it clear that backdating is illegal and that corporate boards need to act swiftly to rectify the wrong doing.
What surprised many was his further discussion on “spring loading”.
The answer to these scenarios is the practice of granted stock at more frequent intervals and in smaller amounts.
We have for years encouraged companies to implement a theory similar to risk-averse investing (predetermine amounts and dates each month, quarter or year).
In addition, regardless of the GAAP accounting method the company used, the company must have recorded some sort of compensation expense for the discounted options. Additional Liabilities Under Sarbanes-Oxley When Congress and the SEC approved the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to amend the Exchange Act, they created additional financial regulations for publicly-owned corporations. Section 403 significantly shortened the time companies are permitted to wait before disclosing transactions involving management or principal stockholders, including option grants. This shortened time frame essentially removes the significant benefits of backdating because the limited volatility most stocks experience over the course of two days narrows the potential discount margin between the market price on the grant date and the strike price. This certification represents that the officers reviewed the company's financial data, and that it presents the financial condition of the company in all material respects. Certain 'performance-based' compensation payments are not counted toward the cap, including stock options that are granted with an exercise price equal to or greater than the FMV of the companies' shares on the date of the grant.
Spring loading options is the practice of granting options just prior to issuing good news (financial performance, merger/acquisition, positive news regarding a regulatory approval and so forth).
If spring loading is deemed to be illegal, it could cause an even worse situation, as spring loading has been common practice in corporate America.
With more criminal charges in the pipeline, companies and executives need to understand the potential scope of criminal liability. ('Securities Act'); Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U. Tax Fraud Executives who used backdating practices may also face criminal prosecution for federal tax fraud. Therefore, to be criminally liable under the Code's criminal statutes, a person must 'willfully attemptto evade or defeat any tax imposed by [the federal government].' I.
There are three major areas of potential criminal liability for former executives involved in stock options backdating: securities fraud, tax fraud, and mail or wire fraud. Backdating only becomes illegal when executives fail to disclose the practice in financial reports, and fail to properly account for backdated options according to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the relevant tax laws. Three possible violations of the Internal Revenue Code ('Code') could create criminal liability for backdating: (1) exceeding the compensation deduction limits of Section 162(m), (2) failing to qualify options under the rules that govern incentive stock options in Section 422, and (3) violating the provisions of Section 409A regulating deferred compensation. In addition, any inadequate internal controls that led to the inaccurate reporting would constitute a separate violation. Intent Requirement For Securities Fraud Under the securities acts, a defendant must act 'willfully' or 'willfully and knowingly.' See 15 U. This intent requirement is important in options backdating cases to determine whether executives may face criminal, rather than merely civil, penalties.